<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Constitution for Governance of Open-Source Projects (v20100227)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://metaoptimize.com/blog/2010/02/27/constitution-for-governance-of-open-source-projects-v20100227/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://metaoptimize.com/blog/2010/02/27/constitution-for-governance-of-open-source-projects-v20100227/</link>
	<description>building machine learning and natural language processing tools</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 04:05:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Evgeny</title>
		<link>http://metaoptimize.com/blog/2010/02/27/constitution-for-governance-of-open-source-projects-v20100227/comment-page-1/#comment-360</link>
		<dc:creator>Evgeny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 23:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.metaoptimize.com/?p=89#comment-360</guid>
		<description>Makes sense. Also - I like that it is concise and sticks to just basic principles.

Should it address the potential side-effects of &quot;undo-ocracy&quot; and &quot;redo-ocracy&quot;?

-Evgeny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Makes sense. Also — I like that it is concise and sticks to just basic principles.</p>
<p>Should it address the potential side-effects of “undo-ocracy” and “redo-ocracy”?</p>
<p>–Evgeny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

