I've read many papers which suggest generating pairs if someone clicked on document and not clicked on some previos documents. It reasonable since user scanned not-clicked documents. But what should I do if my relevance function is already relevant in such case I will consider only mistakes of my relevance function and ignore all good examples. I don't think training on only error corpra as relevance universe can lead to good results. So I'm wondering how can I generate training pairs from correct sorting by baseline relevance function(currently on website)?

asked Oct 17 '12 at 14:08

yura's gravatar image

yura
1025374854

I've read your question a couple of times and I just don't understand it. Sorry. Maybe link to a paper solving the kind of question you're interested in, and frame it in terms of the work presented therein?

(Oct 20 '12 at 15:43) Noel Welsh

Here are three relevant papers on the topic.

Can you learn from ranking functions from clicks? http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/people/zhichdou/ct_ranking_paper.pdf Use randomization in your experiment, randomly twiddle adjacent results: http://www.cs.cornell.edu/people/tj/publications/radlinski_joachims_06a.pdf User click modelling: http://users.cis.fiu.edu/~lzhen001/activities/KDD2011Program/docs/p1388.pdf

(Oct 22 '12 at 10:37) Rob Renaud
Be the first one to answer this question!
toggle preview

powered by OSQA

User submitted content is under Creative Commons: Attribution - Share Alike; Other things copyright (C) 2010, MetaOptimize LLC.