|
I don't understand the notion of Logistic Regression, e.g., in Charles Elkan's lecture. As I see, Logistic Regression is a Log-linear model, a generalization of linear models. But why it is defined as a conditional probability distribution? Here are some details:
Thanks. |
|
1) I think he is distinguishing logistic regression from other classifiers which do not have a probabilistic interpretation. eg perceptron,or you could presumably just use linear regression and a threshold...but this wouldn't give you a probability distribution ( might get negative numbers or numbers greater than 1- but still works fine as classifier). 2) the sample space is {0,1} ( for fixed xin R^n} 3) that is what we want our output to be - the probability of binary outcome y_i=1 given real data x_i. |
Thanks but what I ask is why Logistic Regression can provide "calibrated" probabilities through the functional form of conditional probability distribution. I have already known how Logistic Regression works. What I want to know is why it works from the perspective of probability.
(Nov 07 '12 at 23:18)
Huijia Wu
|