|
According to your personal opinions, what's the most interesting paper in SIGIR 2010? |
|
According to your personal opinions, what's the most interesting paper in SIGIR 2010? |
Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here
Tags:
Asked: Jul 22 '10 at 22:18
Seen: 1,131 times
Last updated: Sep 12 '10 at 15:42
Define "interestingness" 8-)
@Imsasu: I assume he means something like this other question http://metaoptimize.com/qa/questions/1420/acl-2010-what-are-the-most-interesting-papers
@Alexandre Passos: nice, but highly subjective, anyway. Should we enumerate all the papers and vote for them, maybe?
Maybe not all of them, just the ones you have things to say about. Something like the ICML discussion site ( http://mldiscuss.appspot.com/ ), or blog highlights like John Langford's ( http://hunch.net/?p=1450 ) or Hal Daume's ( http://nlpers.blogspot.com/2010/07/acl-2010-retrospective.html ).
Generally I'm always interested in filtered subsets of papers with text written by someone other than their authors' about why they're interesting.