Lasso and Dantzig are both methods for finding sparse solutions to linear regression.

Which one works better for real data sets, say such as MRI or gene sequences?

asked Dec 07 '10 at 23:54

NIPS%202010%20Demo's gravatar image

NIPS 2010 Demo
59789


2 Answers:

It depends and I think it might be hard to say anything in general. There is a recent paper Connections between the Dantzig selector and Lasso that gives some comparisons, and also discusses conditions under which Lasso and Dantzig actually turn out to be equivalent.

answered Dec 08 '10 at 05:12

spinxl39's gravatar image

spinxl39
3698114869

As far I know, the Dantzig selector was introduced for theoretical reasons (basically the mathematicians -Tao- couldn't get proofs with the Lasso), whereas the Lasso is very much used in practice. I suspect that from a practical point of view you want to use the Lasso, although I can't really point to a specific reason.

This answer is marked "community wiki".

answered Dec 11 '10 at 09:13

Gael%20Varoquaux's gravatar image

Gael Varoquaux
92141426

Your answer
toggle preview

powered by OSQA

User submitted content is under Creative Commons: Attribution - Share Alike; Other things copyright (C) 2010, MetaOptimize LLC.