Revision history[back]
click to hide/show revision 1
Revision n. 1

Jul 15 '10 at 15:46

Jurgen's gravatar image

Jurgen
99531419

I think the Combinatory Categorial Grammar (CCG) are also well worth considering. The tools (can be found here) are very well supported and quite mature. As far as speed goes: I've heard they parsed all of english wikipedia with a few tens of machines in under 3 hours (but perhaps the experts can get the exact numbers).

click to hide/show revision 2
Revision n. 2

Jul 15 '10 at 16:19

Jurgen's gravatar image

Jurgen
99531419

I think the Combinatory Categorial Grammar (CCG) are also well worth considering. The tools (can be found here) are very well supported and quite mature. As far as speed goes: I've heard they parsed all of english wikipedia with a few tens of machines in under 3 hours (but perhaps the experts can get the exact numbers).

Update: I can't find a reference to the wikipedia quote so it might be incorrect. In "Linguistically Motivated Large-Scale NLP with C&C and Boxer" I did find that they parsed the Gigaword corpus using 18 machines in under 5 days.

powered by OSQA

User submitted content is under Creative Commons: Attribution - Share Alike; Other things copyright (C) 2010, MetaOptimize LLC.